// compare
Pock vs HashiCorp Vault
HashiCorp Vault is the reference point for enterprise secrets infrastructure: dynamic secrets, leases, a deep policy engine, and total control because you run it yourself. That control has a price: operating Vault well (storage backends, unsealing, upgrades, high availability) is a real engineering commitment, and the operator ultimately sits inside the trust boundary. Pock is the opposite shape: a managed vault where no operator, including us, can read your secrets, because they're encrypted on your device before they ever reach the server.
as of July 2026 - check vendor sites for current details
| Capability | Pock | HashiCorp Vault |
|---|---|---|
| Zero-knowledge E2EE | Yes - secrets encrypted on-device; the server never holds keys or plaintext | No - Vault decrypts server-side; whoever operates Vault (and its unseal/recovery keys) is in the trust boundary |
| Post-quantum cryptography | Yes - X-Wing hybrid (X25519 + ML-KEM-768) | — |
| Key transparency & verifiable releases | Yes - append-only Merkle log anyone can audit | — |
| Dynamic secrets & leases | No - Pock stores static secrets you own | Yes - on-demand database/cloud credentials with TTLs; a signature capability |
| Policy engine & auth methods | Team roles with envelope encryption per member | Extensive - fine-grained policies and many auth backends |
| Deployment & operations | Managed, edge-native on Cloudflare - nothing to run | Self-hosted clusters (storage, unsealing, upgrades, HA) - real operational overhead; a managed cloud offering also exists |
| License / source | Proprietary service with client-verifiable crypto and signed releases | Source-available (BUSL); a community fork (OpenBao) continues under open source |
| CLI | One static binary - login, run, share, vault | Yes - CLI and API-first design |
| Secure one-off sharing & E2EE chat | Yes - encrypted links with expiry/burn-after-read, plus E2EE team chat | — |
| Free personal tier | Yes | Self-hosted community edition is free to run; see vendor for terms |
"—" means not offered or not publicly advertised as of July 2026, to our knowledge.
Choose HashiCorp Vault if
- ›You need dynamic, short-lived credentials minted on demand for databases and clouds.
- ›Self-hosting on your own infrastructure is a hard requirement, and you have the team to operate it.
- ›You need enterprise policy depth, many auth backends, and established compliance postures.
Choose Pock if
- ›You want strong secrets management without running (or paying someone to run) a cluster.
- ›You want the operator outside the trust boundary: zero-knowledge E2EE, post-quantum key exchange, and a public transparency log.
- ›You're a developer, small team, or agent workflow that needs a vault, sharing, and a one-binary CLI, not enterprise infrastructure.
More context: how Pock's security works · all comparisons